Cadillac ATS Cadillac ATS 2016 BMW Z3 BMW Z3 2002

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Cadillac ATS (2016) vs. BMW Z3 (2002) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Cadillac ATS and 2002 BMW Z3 specs.

2016 Cadillac ATS and 2002 BMW Z3 Specifications

Model Year 2016 2002  
Model Cadillac ATS BMW Z3  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS

2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2002 BMW Z3

2002 BMW Z3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2002 2dr Convertible 225-horsepower 3.0L I6
5-speed manual RWD
Just as cramped, but the config does not fit me as well see full BMW Z3 review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.