| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Cadillac ATS and 2006 Cadillac SRX Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
| Model | Cadillac ATS | Cadillac SRX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,957 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,643 mm | 4,950 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,806 mm | 1,844 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,420 mm | 1,722 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,889 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 76 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,024 mm | 979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 975 mm | -40 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,041 mm | 850 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 889 mm | -889 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,107 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,400 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 615 mm | -615 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 238 L | 51 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 917 L | -906.8 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 1,968 L | 9.2 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
| 2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Cadillac SRX
| 2006 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rooms for me so room for friends to ride without being cramped see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
My 10 year old son is already over 5 feet and he fits behind me OK. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2006 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
