Model Year | 2017 | 2021 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Ford Expedition | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 3,112 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,334 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 2,029 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,946 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,435 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 88 L | -27 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,067 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,648 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,016 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,590 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,054 mm | 850 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 947 mm | -947 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,631 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,306 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 917 mm | -917 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,012 mm (over 3 rows) | -2 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 547 L | -258 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,628 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,962 L | 8.2 |
2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2021 Ford Expedition.