Model Year | 2016 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Ford Explorer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,860 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,006 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,788 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,057 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 70 L | -9 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,031 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,557 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,031 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,029 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,011 mm | 850 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,290 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,034 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 843 mm | -843 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,885 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 595 L | -306 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,240 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,285 L | 8.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Explorer.