Model Year | 2016 | 2017 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Ford Fiesta | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,489 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,722 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,169 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 47 L | 14 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 993 mm | -13 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,285 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,072 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 942 mm | -7 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,245 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,250 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 792 mm | 59 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,864 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 289 L | 362 L | -73 L |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Ford Fiesta.