| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Cadillac ATS and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Cadillac ATS | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 112.9 in | -3.6 in |
| Length | 182.8 in | 202.9 in | -20.1 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 76.2 in | -5.1 in |
| Height | 55.9 in | 60.7 in | -4.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3373 lb. | 4015 lb. | -642 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 39.0 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 57.9 in | -2.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.0 in | 56.3 in | -3.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 41.9 in | 0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 37.8 in | -1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 56.9 in | -3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 55.8 in | -3.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 38.1 in | -4.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 80 in (over 2 rows) | -4 in |
| Cargo Volume | 10.2 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | -9.9 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
| 2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
