Cadillac ATS Cadillac ATS 2016 Ford Transit Connect Ford Transit Connect 2013
MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Cadillac ATS (2016) vs. Ford Transit Connect (2013) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Cadillac ATS and 2013 Ford Transit Connect specs.

2016 Cadillac ATS and 2013 Ford Transit Connect Specifications

Model Year 2016 2013  
Model Cadillac ATS Ford Transit Connect  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body 2dr Coupe 4dr Minivan  
      Difference
Wheelbase 2,776 mm 2,911 mm 0 mm
Length 4,663 mm 4,590 mm 0 mm
Width 1,842 mm 1,796 mm 0 mm
Height 1,392 mm 2,014 mm -1 mm
Curb Weight 1,550 kg 1,554 kg 0 kg
Fuel Capacity 61 L 58 L 3 L
Headroom, Row 1 955 mm 1,298 mm 954 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1 1,374 mm 1,382 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1 1,374 mm 1,290 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 1 1,074 mm 1,029 mm 0 mm
Headroom, Row 2 892 mm 1,283 mm 891 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2 1,298 mm 1,514 mm 0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2 1,130 mm 1,519 mm 0 mm
Legroom, Row 2 851 mm 978 mm -127 mm
Total Legroom 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) -1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum 294 L 2,212 L 292 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum 10.4 3,831 L 7.4

Return to top

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS

2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect

2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.