Model Year | 2016 | 2023 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 3,063 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,826 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,819 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,813 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 60 L | 1 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,191 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,377 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,161 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 955 mm | -104 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,064 mm | -1 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,430 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,194 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 889 mm | -889 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 705 L | -416 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,702 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 3,002 L | 7.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Ford Transit Connect.