| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Cadillac ATS and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2012 | |
| Model | Cadillac ATS | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 98.4 in | 10.9 in |
| Length | 182.8 in | 161.6 in | 21.2 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 66.7 in | 4.4 in |
| Height | 55.9 in | 60.0 in | -4.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3375 lb. | 2496 lb. | 879 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 5.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 40.4 in | -1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 52.7 in | 2.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.0 in | 51.5 in | 1.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 41.3 in | 1.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 39.0 in | -2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 51.3 in | 2.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 51.3 in | 1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 34.5 in | -1 in |
| Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 0.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.2 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -10.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -47.1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS
| 2013 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The latest 3-Series has a roomy, comfortable back seat. Cadillac didn't see this coming, and sized the ATS to compete with the previous-generation BMW. Consequently, the Cadillac's rear seat is considerably tighter than the BMW's or the Infiniti G37's, a little tighter than an A4's, about even with that in a C-Class, and roomier than that in a Lexus IS. If you want adults to be comfortable in back, the ATS isn't your car, but neither are most of the cars it competes with. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Cadillac ATS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
