| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Cadillac ATS and 2006 Honda S2000 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
| Model | Cadillac ATS | Honda S2000 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 94.5 in | 14.8 in |
| Length | 183.6 in | 162.2 in | 21.4 in |
| Width | 72.5 in | 68.9 in | 3.6 in |
| Height | 54.8 in | 50.0 in | 4.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 3418 lb. | 2855 lb. | 563 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 2.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 34.6 in | 3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.1 in | 50.7 in | 3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.1 in | 49.8 in | 4.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 44.3 in | -2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 35.1 in | 0.0 in | 35.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.1 in | 0.0 in | 51.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 44.5 in | 0.0 in | 44.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 0.0 in | 33.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 44.3 in (over 1 rows) | 31.5 in |
| Cargo Volume | 10.4 ft3 | 5.0 ft3 | 5.4 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
| 2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Honda S2000
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seats are aggressively bolstered, but fit very comfortably. I am a 6 foot tall slightly overweight male. The seat adjusts adequately to my height, unlike several other convertibles I have driven. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Fits taller people than other roadsters I have tried. Probably comparable with modern BMW Z4 but I did not try that. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seat feels hard and is difficult to get adjusted properly. see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2006 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
this car is engineered for speed, no wasted space.front quarters are cramped as one would expect with a roadster see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 6' tall with a 33" inseam, 149 lbs, 30" waist. I fit exactly in every direction. The hip width of the seats is exactly mine, the seat is all the way back, and the back is ever so slightly tipped upwards from full back. Comfortable but see full Honda S2000 review |
| 2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 5' 9" and 185# and of average frame proportions. The seat bolsters are Proportioned for the Asian torso. So, the average-to-large European butt isn't going to appreciate the tight seat bolsters. This is why the bolsters quickly break down and need re-padding with firm foam. see full Honda S2000 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
