Model Year | 2016 | 2009 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Jeep Commander | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,781 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,788 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,900 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,826 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,078 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 78 L | -17 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,069 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,021 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,372 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 917 mm | -66 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 907 mm | -907 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,280 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,204 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 734 mm | -734 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,710 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 170 L | 119 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,031 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 1,945 L | 9.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Jeep Commander.