Model Year | 2016 | 2023 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 3,124 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,453 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 2,123 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,920 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,908 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 100 L | -39 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,049 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,610 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,016 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,656 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,600 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,085 mm | 850 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 991 mm | -991 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,636 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,311 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 930 mm | -930 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 3,053 mm (over 3 rows) | -2 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 776 L | -487 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 2,008 L | 8.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,667 L | 8.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.