Model Year | 2015 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Land Rover LR4 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,885 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,829 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,882 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,565 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 86 L | -25 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,026 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,077 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,504 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 955 mm | -104 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,019 mm | -1 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,087 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,954 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 280 L | 9 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,260 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,475 L | 8.2 |
2015 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Land Rover LR4.