Model Year | 2016 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Lincoln MKS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,222 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,928 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,907 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 72 L | -11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,008 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 978 mm | -43 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 980 mm | -129 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,045 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 289 L | 544 L | -255 L |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKS.