Model Year | 2017 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Lincoln Navigator | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 3,023 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,268 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 2,002 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,644 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 106 L | -45 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,003 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,608 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,529 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,044 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,008 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,618 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,521 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 993 mm | -142 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 955 mm | -955 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,318 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,273 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 958 mm | -958 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,995 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 513 L | -224 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,540 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,925 L | 8.2 |
2017 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln Navigator.