Model Year | 2016 | 2018 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Mazda CX-9 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,929 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,065 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,969 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,753 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 72 L | -11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 998 mm | -18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 978 mm | -43 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,001 mm | 850 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,349 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,019 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 754 mm | -754 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 408 L | -119 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,082 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,016 L | 8.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-9.