| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2019 Cadillac ATS and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2019 | 2012 | |
| Model | Cadillac ATS | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,663 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,392 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,550 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 76 L | -15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 1,006 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,374 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,374 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 892 mm | 991 mm | -99 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,298 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,130 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 1,011 mm | 850 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 294 L | 487 L | -193 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.4 | 1,368 L | 9.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.4 | 2,852 L | 8.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Cadillac ATS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
