Model Year | 2015 | 2016 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Toyota Highlander | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,789 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,854 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,730 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,875 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 73 L | -12 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,034 mm | 979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,506 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,123 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,013 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 975 mm | -124 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 912 mm | -912 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,397 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,158 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 704 mm | -704 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,802 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 391 L | -102 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,198 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,370 L | 8.2 |
2015 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Highlander.