Model Year | 2016 | 2007 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 4,890 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 1,941 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,859 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,445 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 96 L | -35 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 996 mm | -16 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,585 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 993 mm | -58 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,554 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 871 mm | -20 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 925 mm | -925 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,554 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,430 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 693 mm | -693 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 589 L | -300 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,110 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,571 L | 8.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2007 Toyota Land Cruiser.