| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Cadillac ATS and 2010 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2010 | |
| Model | Cadillac ATS | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 102.4 in | 6.9 in |
| Length | 182.8 in | 171.9 in | 10.9 in |
| Width | 71.1 in | 69.5 in | 1.6 in |
| Height | 55.9 in | 61.4 in | -5.5 in |
| Curb Weight | 3373 lb. | 2865 lb. | 508 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.0 gal. | 13.2 gal. | 2.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.6 in | 40.5 in | -1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 53.3 in | 1.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.0 in | 52.3 in | 0.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.5 in | 41.6 in | 0.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 39.3 in | -2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 52.6 in | 1.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 52.3 in | 43.7 in | 8.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.5 in | 36.2 in | -2.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | -1.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.2 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 | -9.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 ft3 | 61.5 ft3 | -51.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
| 2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
