Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | BMW X5 | |
Engine | supercharged 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 556 hp@6100 551 lb-ft@3800 |
turbocharged 4.4L V8 DOHC-4v 567 hp@6000 553 lb-ft@2200 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 115.5 in | -2.1 in |
Length | 191.6 in | 193.2 in | -1.6 in |
Width | 72.6 in | 76.3 in | -3.7 in |
Height | 59.1 in | 69.4 in | -10.3 in |
Curb Weight | 4432 lb. | 5260 lb. | -828 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 22.4 gal. | -4.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 40.5 in | -1.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 60.5 in | -3.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 0.0 in | 55.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 40.4 in | 2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 38.8 in | -1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.3 in | 58.3 in | -2 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 0.0 in | 54.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 35.9 in | 36.6 in | -0.7 in |
Total Legroom | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 77 in (over 2 rows) | 1.3 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 25.0 ft3 | 22.9 ft3 | 2.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 58.0 ft3 | 66.0 ft3 | -8 ft3 |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 BMW X5.