Model Year | 2013 | 2006 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Cadillac SRX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,957 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 4,950 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,844 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,501 mm | 1,722 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,842 kg | 1,889 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 76 L | -8 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,024 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 975 mm | -30 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 1,041 mm | 911 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 889 mm | -889 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,107 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,400 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 615 mm | -615 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 708 L | 238 L | 470 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.0 | 917 L | -892 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,642 L | 1,968 L | 0 L |
2013 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The first two generations of the CTS were "in between" cars larger than a BMW 3-Series but more compact than a BMW 5-Series. Contented and priced like the former, they weren't pitched as competitors to the latter. With the third-generation sedan this has changed. The new CTS leaves the 3er for the ATS and goes head-to-head with the 5er. However, the 2014's exterior and interior are only a bit more expansive than those of the 2008-2013 car. Also, the rear doors do not open wide enough for easy entry. You'll still find a roomier, more comfortable, easier to access rear seat in the 5-Series, even if the official specs suggest otherwise. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2013 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Sedan 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Hard to get in and out of. not much head room. The material is nice. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2006 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rooms for me so room for friends to ride without being cramped see full Cadillac SRX review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
My 10 year old son is already over 5 feet and he fits behind me OK. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2006 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |