Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Cadillac XTS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,837 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 5,131 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,852 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,473 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,745 kg | 1,817 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 72 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 991 mm | -5 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 960 mm | -15 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 1,016 mm | 911 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,085 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 385 L | 510 L | -125 L |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac XTS.