Cadillac CTS (2009) vs. Chevrolet SS (2014) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 Cadillac CTS and 2014 Chevrolet SS specs.
2009 Cadillac CTS and 2014 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year |
2009 |
2014 |
|
| Model |
Cadillac CTS |
Chevrolet SS |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Sedan |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,880 mm |
2,916 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
4,867 mm |
4,966 mm |
0 mm |
| Width |
1,842 mm |
1,897 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,473 mm |
1,471 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,751 kg |
1,803 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
68 L |
72 L |
-4 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
986 mm |
983 mm |
3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,440 mm |
1,501 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,400 mm |
1,453 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,077 mm |
1,074 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
945 mm |
965 mm |
-20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,389 mm |
1,499 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,374 mm |
1,473 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
912 mm |
1,008 mm |
911 mm |
| Total Legroom |
1,989 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
-1 mm |
| Cargo Volume |
385 L |
464 L |
-79 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Cadillac CTS
| 2008 |
4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
supportive but comfortable for a long trip
see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 |
4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Ingress is tight, limited legroom.
see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2008 |
4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seats are a little snug, but bareable. However, if someone is pretty tall they might bump their head on the ceiling.
see full Cadillac CTS review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans,
Wagons, and
Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Cadillac models.
