| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Cadillac CTS and 2017 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2017 | |
| Model | Cadillac CTS | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,867 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,842 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,473 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,751 kg | 1,813 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 71 L | -3 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 983 mm | 3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 965 mm | -20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 1,008 mm | 911 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 385 L | 464 L | -79 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Cadillac CTS
| 2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
supportive but comfortable for a long trip see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Ingress is tight, limited legroom. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seats are a little snug, but bareable. However, if someone is pretty tall they might bump their head on the ceiling. see full Cadillac CTS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
