We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Cadillac CTS vs. Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Fuel Economy (km/L)

Chart is based on 133 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac CTS and 105 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.

Cadillac CTS km/L

Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2016 52.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2011 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 54.1 MPG Highway Percentage 93 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 42.9 MPG Highway Percentage 34 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2010 60.0 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 35.9 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 53.2 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2009 46.7 MPG Highway Percentage 37 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 46.3 MPG Highway Percentage 24 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 46.3 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 53.1 MPG Highway Percentage 53 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 55.1 MPG Highway Percentage 74 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2008 45.4 MPG Highway Percentage 17 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 47.8 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2007 45.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 43.3 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 49.4 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 41.5 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 7.1 MPG Highway Percentage 25 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2006 45.1 MPG Highway Percentage 23 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 48.7 MPG Highway Percentage 57 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 47.5 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2005 51.2 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 49.9 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 51.6 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2004 60.2 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Cadillac CTS Cadillac CTS 2003 33.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2016 4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L I4
8-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 0 0 60 40 70 52.1  
2011 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med hvy 23 40 13 23 83 17.0  
2010 4dr Wagon 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills light light 0 5 2 93 60 54.1  
2010 4dr Wagon 270-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat v.lt none 0 64 3 34 70 42.9  
2010 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 0 0 0 100 70 60.0  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills lead light 10 8 39 44 62 35.9  
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD
hills lead light 5 5 35 55 65 31.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
hills med hvy 11 16 21 53 71 53.2  
2009 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med light 3 18 42 37 57 46.7  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 10 32 34 24 72 46.3  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
flat med none 4 23 42 31 70 46.3  
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
hills med light 8 25 15 53 75 53.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light none 1 6 19 74 70 55.1  
2008 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
hills med light 0 0 83 17 70 45.4  
2007 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat light light 4 9 9 78 71 47.8  
2007 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
mtns lead light 0 0 70 30 60 45.9  
2006 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 6.0L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med hvy 15 50 0 35 70 43.3  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat lead light 25 10 5 60 85 49.4  
2006 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 11 11 72 80 41.5  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat light none 5 20 50 25 100 7.1  
2006 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 7 20 50 23 67 45.1  
2005 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 7 13 24 57 69 48.7  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD
flat med none 2 15 35 48 60 47.5  
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 8 12 33 47 69 51.2  
2004 4dr Sedan 400-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD
flat med light 0 0 30 70 67 49.9  
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 7 25 24 45 66 51.6  
2004 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed manual RWD
flat med light 10 10 0 80 70 60.2  
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 10 17 33 40 91 33.1  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac CTS fuel economy data.

Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban km/L

Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2012 35.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2011 37.6 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2011 43.3 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2010 35.9 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2009 41.9 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2009 41.9 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2008 36.5 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2008 42.3 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2008 32.1 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2007 22.9 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2007 40.1 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2007 37.5 MPG Highway Percentage 47 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2006 35.8 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2006 35.1 MPG Highway Percentage 38 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2006 40.7 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2005 36.0 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2005 40.7 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2005 32.6 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2004 32.0 MPG Highway Percentage 20 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2004 32.2 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2004 24.7 MPG Highway Percentage 65 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2004 37.5 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2004 34.6 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2003 34.2 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2003 31.6 MPG Highway Percentage 56 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2003 28.2 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2003 37.2 MPG Highway Percentage 36 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2002 57.6 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2002 37.1 MPG Highway Percentage 48 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2002 35.2 MPG Highway Percentage 3 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2000 37.2 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban 2000 30.7 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd km/L
2012 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light none 0 10 40 50 65 35.3  
2011 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med light 10 50 10 30 80 37.6  
2011 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD
hills med light 15 23 28 36 71 43.3  
2010 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 17 33 21 30 71 35.9  
2009 4dr SUV, ext. 310-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 10 40 0 50 70 41.9  
2009 4dr SUV, ext. 310-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med light 10 10 40 40 75 41.9  
2008 4dr SUV 332-horsepower 6.0L V8 Hybrid
4-speed 2-mode automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 0 85 0 15 75 36.5  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2008 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 45 10 5 40 80 42.3  
2008 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light hvy 3 38 10 49 77 32.1  
2007 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light none 7 38 36 20 85 22.9  
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 19 31 11 40 65 40.1  
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med light 8 26 18 47 69 37.5  
2006 4dr SUV 335-horsepower 6.0L V8
4-speed automatic AWD
flat light none 5 10 10 75 65 35.8  
2006 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 20 43 0 38 73 35.1  
2006 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med light 0 10 40 50 70 40.7  
2005 4dr SUV, ext. 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills light light 0 0 80 20 65 36.0  
2005 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med hvy 5 15 60 20 60 40.7  
2005 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med light 4 16 39 41 74 32.6  
2004 4dr SUV, ext. 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med hvy 0 40 40 20 65 32.0  
2004 4dr SUV, ext. 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills light light 3 3 65 30 73 32.2  
2004 4dr SUV, ext. 180-horsepower 4.3L V6
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
mtns lead hvy 5 15 15 65 75 24.7  
2004 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light hvy 10 17 34 40 64 37.5  
2004 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med hvy 10 20 28 43 70 34.6  
2003 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 0 0 50 50 60 34.2  
2003 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med light 6 29 9 56 69 31.6  
2003 4dr SUV 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 10 70 10 10 65 28.2  
2003 4dr SUV 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med none 9 24 31 36 65 37.2  
2002 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 4 43 9 43 60 57.6  
2002 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills med hvy 5 20 28 48 60 37.1  
2002 4dr SUV 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med none 2 20 74 3 75 35.2  
2000 4dr SUV, ext. 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light hvy 0 0 0 100 70 37.2  
2000 4dr SUV 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills light light 0 0 85 15 60 30.7  

Return to top

Cadillac CTS vs. Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Fuel Economy (km/L)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Cadillac CTS and Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world km/L based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans, Wagons, and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models and Chevrolet models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
With the 2011 528i, BMW pioneered the use of a turbocharged four-cylinder engine in a $60,000 midsize sedan on this side of the Atlantic. The point: fuel economy, specifically EPA ratings of 22 mpg city and 33 mpg highway even with all-wheel-drive (24/34 with RWD). Audi followed with an A6 2.0T good for 20/29 (25/33 with FWD) a year later. The new CTS takes the path blazed by the Germans, but much less effectively. Though the Cadillac weighs significantly less than the Audi or the BMW, its EPA ratings are lower, 19/28 (20/30 with RWD). The same is the case with the two 3.6-liter V6 engine options, even though unlike the turbo four they can be paired with an eight-speed (instead of a six-speed) automatic. The rear-drive-only Vsport barely evades the gas guzzler tax with ratings of 16/24. Even the 445-horsepower turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 in the BMW 550i does a bit better. In my real-world driving, the CTS's trip computer confirmed this shortcoming. Even considering that the outside temperature was near zero, post-warm-up averages that clustered around 18 were disappointing. Only by driving the car with a light foot could I nudge the suburban average over 20, and even then not much over. A 320-horsepower 3.0-liter 640i Grand Coupe tested a week earlier in similar conditions did at least one mpg better than the 272-horsepower, 2.0-liter Cadillac. And when I tested a 528i xDrive in slightly warmer temps it often managed 25 mpg (in an EcoPro Mode the Cadillac lacks). In one trip this BMW even touched 30. see full Cadillac CTS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac CTS

Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
fill for $50 on reg. today that is cheap see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
23 cty & 26 hwy need i say more see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
Averaging 25.5 on the highway. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
The fuel economy is better than expected, when driven in mixed city/highway driving. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I get 25 miles per gallon - mostly highway driving - which is reasonable for a car of this size and performance. see full Cadillac CTS review
2003 4dr Sedan 220-horsepower 3.2L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
about 26 mpg is great....im use to driving a suv where im luckey to get 16mpg highway see full Cadillac CTS review
Cadillac CTS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan supercharged 556hp 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
14mpg is not great. However, the performance makes more than up for it. see full Cadillac CTS review
2008 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD
City mileage acceptable; Highway mileage could be better. see full Cadillac CTS review
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
I get 20-21mpg on my commute which is about 70%hwy, and normally 25-27 with pure freeway driving, it just seems with technology today they could kick that up to 23-24 and 28-30 respectively. see full Cadillac CTS review
2004 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
Average at best. Yea it is a heavy car with all the safety eqipment. see full Cadillac CTS review
 

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban

Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearComment
2015 You didn't expect to see fuel economy among the reasons to buy a Tahoe, did you? Of course, fuel economy remains well below that for most smaller, lighter vehicles. But General Motors has substantially improved the SUV's efficiency by adding variable valve timing, direct injection (fuel is injected under high pressure directly into the cylinder, rather than into the manifold), and cylinder deactivation to the 5.3-liter V8. EPA ratings improved from 15 city, 21 highway to 16/23 with 2WD and 16/22 with 4WD. I observed averages as high as 21 in the suburbs and 26 on the highway, quite impressive for an 80-inch-wide, 74-inch-tall, three-ton vehicle. Transitions between V4 and V8 operation are not perceptible, with the engine usually in the former mode when not accelerating, even at highway speeds. Ford took a different approach to improving fuel economy, replacing its 5.4-liter V8 with a turbocharged 3.5-liter V6. The resulting EPA ratings of 15 mpg city and 20 mpg highway are better than before, but aren't as good as the Tahoe's. My trip computer averages were similarly two to three mpg shy of those observed in the Tahoe. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban

Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
For a Big SUV, 20mpg is all I could ask for right now. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2010 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
I don't really have any complaints about this vehicle for our uses. But many people do buy them and don't use them for their intended purposes, and then complain about paying for gas. Well, it is a truck, after all. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2010 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
Even though its fuel economy is great for its size, it still uses a lot of gas see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2007 4dr SUV, ext. 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
In mostly local suburban areas we average 12 MPG. Highway only can reach 18 or 19 depending on load and hills. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Fuel economy is not great, but it's not horrible either. Again, this is a full size SUV on a truck platform. How much can anyone truly complain when you know this going in? see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
not economical see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2007 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
17.2 to 17.4 on combined city and highway (more highway) see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2006 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
V8 sucks gas like a ... V8; 18 MPG in all around driving see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2005 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Poor gas mileage... but I knew this before purchasing it so this is not a problem for me. If gas prices scare you... then this is not the vehicle for you. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2005 4dr SUV, ext. 295-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
At $4 a gallon and a 32 gallon gas tank, you feel it every time you fill up and if you drive a lot in the city, at 15 mpg, you will fill up often. The vehicle actually garners a respectable 21 mpg on the highway. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review
2003 4dr SUV 285-horsepower 5.3L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
The obvious. 16 MPG highway. Enough said. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review