Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 5,131 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 2,007 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,501 mm | 1,953 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,828 kg | 2,471 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 98 L | -30 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,044 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,636 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 996 mm | -51 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,656 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,539 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 991 mm | -79 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 963 mm | -963 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,567 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,247 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 650 mm | -650 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,690 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 708 L | 479 L | 229 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.0 | 1,708 L | 24 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,642 L | 3,084 L | -2 L |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.