Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Dodge Charger | |
Engine | supercharged 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 415 kW@6100 747 Nm@3800 |
supercharged 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 527 kW@6000 881 Nm@4800 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 3,053 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 5,039 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,905 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,473 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,930 kg | 2,075 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 70 L | -2 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 980 mm | 6 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 930 mm | 15 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 1,019 mm | 911 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,080 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 385 L | 456 L | -71 L |
2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
supportive but comfortable for a long trip see full Cadillac CTS review |
2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Ingress is tight, limited legroom. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seats are a little snug, but bareable. However, if someone is pretty tall they might bump their head on the ceiling. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review |
2015 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Dodge Charger.