| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Cadillac CTS and 2007 Ford Expedition Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2007 | |
| Model | Cadillac CTS | Ford Expedition | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 119.0 in | -5.6 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 206.5 in | -14.9 in |
| Width | 72.6 in | 78.8 in | -6.2 in |
| Height | 59.1 in | 77.2 in | -18.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 4060 lb. | 5578 lb. | -1518 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 28.0 gal. | -10 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 39.6 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 63.2 in | -6.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 60.2 in | -5.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.1 in | 1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 39.8 in | -2.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.3 in | 63.7 in | -7.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 59.9 in | -5.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.9 in | 39.1 in | -3.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.3 in | -38.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 51.9 in | -51.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.2 in | -50.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 37.7 in | -37.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 117.9 in (over 3 rows) | -39.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 25.0 ft3 | 18.6 ft3 | 6.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.0 | 55.0 ft3 | -30 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 58.0 ft3 | 108.3 ft3 | -50.3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Cadillac CTS
| 2012 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Cadillac CTS
| 2012 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Hard to get in and out of. not much head room. The material is nice. see full Cadillac CTS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Ford Expedition
| 2007 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of leg room in 2nd and 3rd row. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
room to get comfortable on long trips; e-z access to coffee, my phone, my wallet; birds-eye view of the road see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Like sitting in your favorite easy chair in your living room. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of space for larger people and lots of space between front passenger and driver. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Can fit two adults and a car seat in the second row seat. Third row is just as comfortable. see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Lots of leg room! see full Ford Expedition review |
| 2007 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Hard and flat. see full Ford Expedition review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
