Model Year | 2010 | 2022 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Ford Explorer | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 3,025 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 5,050 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 2,004 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,501 mm | 1,775 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,828 kg | 1,971 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 68 L | 0 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,034 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,570 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,504 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 1,029 mm | 944 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,572 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 991 mm | -79 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,387 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,039 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 818 mm | -818 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,883 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 708 L | 515 L | 193 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.0 | 1,356 L | 24 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,642 L | 2,486 L | -1 L |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Ford Explorer.