Model Year | 2012 | 2006 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Honda S2000 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Convertible | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,400 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,788 mm | 4,120 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,882 mm | 1,750 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,270 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,773 kg | 1,295 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 50 L | 18 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 937 mm | 879 mm | 58 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,422 mm | 1,288 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,384 mm | 1,265 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,125 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 879 mm | 0 mm | 879 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,293 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,212 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,966 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,125 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 297 L | 142 L | 155 L |
2012 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2012 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Sedan 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Hard to get in and out of. not much head room. The material is nice. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seats are aggressively bolstered, but fit very comfortably. I am a 6 foot tall slightly overweight male. The seat adjusts adequately to my height, unlike several other convertibles I have driven. see full Honda S2000 review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Fits taller people than other roadsters I have tried. Probably comparable with modern BMW Z4 but I did not try that. see full Honda S2000 review |
2006 Honda S2000 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
Seat feels hard and is difficult to get adjusted properly. see full Honda S2000 review |
2006 | 2dr Convertible 237-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
this car is engineered for speed, no wasted space.front quarters are cramped as one would expect with a roadster see full Honda S2000 review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 6' tall with a 33" inseam, 149 lbs, 30" waist. I fit exactly in every direction. The hip width of the seats is exactly mine, the seat is all the way back, and the back is ever so slightly tipped upwards from full back. Comfortable but see full Honda S2000 review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 240-horsepower 2.2L I4 6-speed manual RWD |
I'm 5' 9" and 185# and of average frame proportions. The seat bolsters are Proportioned for the Asian torso. So, the average-to-large European butt isn't going to appreciate the tight seat bolsters. This is why the bolsters quickly break down and need re-padding with firm foam. see full Honda S2000 review |