Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,662 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 4,369 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,473 mm | 1,636 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,751 kg | 1,658 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 69 L | -1 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,024 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,438 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,095 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 1,008 mm | 944 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 907 mm | 5 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 385 L | 575 L | -190 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.6 | 1,444 L | 12.6 |
2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
supportive but comfortable for a long trip see full Cadillac CTS review |
2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Ingress is tight, limited legroom. see full Cadillac CTS review |
2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seats are a little snug, but bareable. However, if someone is pretty tall they might bump their head on the ceiling. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.