Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Lincoln MKS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 5,222 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,928 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,473 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,745 kg | 1,907 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 72 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,008 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 978 mm | -33 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 980 mm | -68 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,045 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 385 L | 544 L | -159 L |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Lincoln MKS.