Model Year | 2010 | 2009 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Lincoln MKX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 2,824 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 4,737 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,501 mm | 1,707 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,828 kg | 1,914 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 72 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,016 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,496 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,034 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 998 mm | -53 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,494 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 998 mm | -86 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 708 L | 906 L | -198 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,642 L | 1,945 L | 0 L |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Lincoln MKX.