Model Year | 2019 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Lincoln MKZ | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,911 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,966 mm | 4,930 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,834 mm | 1,864 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,453 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,658 kg | 1,687 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 62 L | 10 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 996 mm | 963 mm | 33 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,367 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,082 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 953 mm | 930 mm | 23 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,392 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,354 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 899 mm | 940 mm | -41 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,981 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 388 L | 436 L | -48 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Cadillac CTS.
2015 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Ford Fusion. In the Lincoln MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKZ.