| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Cadillac CTS and 2018 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2018 | |
| Model | Cadillac CTS | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 106.2 in | 7.2 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 179.1 in | 12.5 in |
| Width | 72.5 in | 72.5 in | 0 in |
| Height | 58.0 in | 65.3 in | -7.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3861 lb. | 3563 lb. | 298 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 14.8 gal. | 3.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 39.7 in | -0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 57.1 in | -0.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 55.2 in | -0.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.0 in | 1.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 39.0 in | -1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.7 in | 54.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 55.3 in | -1.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.9 in | 39.6 in | -3.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -2.3 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.6 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -17.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.6 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -46 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Cadillac CTS
| 2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
supportive but comfortable for a long trip see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Ingress is tight, limited legroom. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seats are a little snug, but bareable. However, if someone is pretty tall they might bump their head on the ceiling. see full Cadillac CTS review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
| 2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
