| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Cadillac CTS and 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2010 | |
| Model | Cadillac CTS | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 108.5 in | 4.9 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 178.3 in | 13.3 in |
| Width | 72.5 in | 72.4 in | 0.1 in |
| Height | 58.0 in | 66.9 in | -8.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 3861 lb. | 4034 lb. | -173 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 17.4 gal. | 0.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 39.8 in | -1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 55.2 in | 1.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 53.2 in | 1.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.8 in | 0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 39.7 in | -2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.7 in | 55.4 in | -0.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 52.5 in | 1.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.9 in | 35.1 in | 0.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 1.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.6 ft3 | 23.3 ft3 | -9.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.6 ft3 | 54.7 ft3 | -41.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Cadillac CTS
| 2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
supportive but comfortable for a long trip see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2009 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Ingress is tight, limited legroom. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seats are a little snug, but bareable. However, if someone is pretty tall they might bump their head on the ceiling. see full Cadillac CTS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
I have a problem with headroom. So many cars give me less than a half inch from my scalp to the frame on the sunroof. That hurts over bumps, not to mention what my hair looks like when I get out. GLK has over an inch of space for me. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
| 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
If you are 6' plus like me, you will have to adjust the front seat forward if you want passengers to ride with you unless they are quite small. But this is a perfect city hauler for a single or couple. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
When the front seats are positioned comfortably aft for a six footer, the second row passengers have way too little leg room. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Cramped and uncomfortable for anyone over 5 feet tall. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Wife and I are 5.9 and 5.5 respectively. kids can easily kick the seat (whcih in the Benz you want there feet off things). Not bad in sense it feels roomy when in it, but if you are looking for LOTS of space, look elsewhere. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We've only had the GLK-350 for a week. The backseat seems a little on the small side. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
small see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
