Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
Model | Cadillac Escalade | Cadillac ATS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,144 mm | 4,643 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,007 mm | 1,806 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,928 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,581 kg | 1,530 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 61 L | 37 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,659 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,080 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 935 mm | 61 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,656 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,539 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 851 mm | 140 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 963 mm | 0 mm | 963 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,567 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,247 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 650 mm | 0 mm | 650 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,690 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 479 L | 289 L | 190 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,708 L | 10.2 | -9.2 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,084 L | 10.2 | -7.2 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Cadillac Escalade.
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.