Model Year | 2014 | 2010 | |
Model | Cadillac Escalade | Cadillac CTS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,880 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,144 mm | 4,867 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,007 mm | 1,844 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,928 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,490 kg | 1,828 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 68 L | 30 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,659 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 945 mm | 51 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,656 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,539 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 912 mm | 79 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 963 mm | 0 mm | 963 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,567 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,247 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 650 mm | 0 mm | 650 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,690 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 479 L | 708 L | -229 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,708 L | 25.0 | -24 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,084 L | 1,642 L | 2 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Cadillac Escalade.
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.