| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2023 Cadillac Escalade and 2013 Cadillac XTS Specifications
| Model Year | 2023 | 2013 | |
| Model | Cadillac Escalade | Cadillac XTS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,071 mm | 2,837 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,382 mm | 5,131 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 2,060 mm | 1,852 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,948 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,556 kg | 1,817 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 72 L | 19 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,664 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,567 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,130 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 960 mm | 28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,641 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,554 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,059 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 970 mm | 0 mm | 970 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,593 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,255 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 886 mm | 0 mm | 886 mm |
| Total Legroom | 3,076 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,085 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 722 L | 510 L | 212 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,064 L | 18.0 | -16 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,426 L | 18.0 | -15 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2023 Cadillac Escalade
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Cadillac Escalade.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS
| 2013 Cadillac XTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | The generously sized front buckets inside the XTS are among the most comfortable and supportive you'll find, assuming you like your seating on the firm (if not quite Audi-firm) side. Those seeking a cushier seat with an optional massager (not offered in the XTS) will find one in the MKS. Both cars' front seats provide more lateral support than you might expect from America's remaining large luxury sedans, but still not a lot. After all, hardcore canyon carving isn't the primary objective. Despite their much larger number of adjustments, I found the Audi A8's front seats to be overly firm and less form-fitting than those in the Detroiters. The rear seat of the XTS is also quite comfortable--for two people. Basing the XTS on GM's Epsilon platform, originally created for much smaller cars, has a cost. It's much cheaper and easier to lengthen a platform than to widen one. So the XTS is essentially a stretched midsize sedan rather than a truly large one. Rear legroom is abundant despite insufficient space for feet beneath the front seats, but the cabin is decidedly midsize in breadth. The compact Dodge Dart (admittedly wide and heavy for its class) provides as much space for shoulders. Rear seat passengers sit much closer to the front seats in the MKS, which consequently doesn't feel nearly as roomy in back. But the Lincoln's rear seat cushion is higher off the floor, and so provides better thigh support for adults. The Audi easily provides the most space for three abreast. For XTS-matching legroom, though, you'll have to step up to the extended wheelbase version. see full Cadillac XTS review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Cadillac XTS.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
