| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Cadillac Escalade and 2013 Ford Transit Connect Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2013 | |
| Model | Cadillac Escalade | Ford Transit Connect | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,911 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,144 mm | 4,590 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,007 mm | 1,796 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,928 mm | 2,014 mm | -1 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,570 kg | 1,554 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 58 L | 40 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 1,298 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,659 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,290 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 1,283 mm | 995 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,656 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,539 mm | 1,519 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 978 mm | 13 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 963 mm | 0 mm | 963 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,567 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,247 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 650 mm | 0 mm | 650 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,690 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 479 L | 2,212 L | 477 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,708 L | 78.1 | -77.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,084 L | 3,831 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Cadillac Escalade
| 2008 Cadillac Escalade Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr SUV, ext. 403-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Lots of room for the driver and passenger see full Cadillac Escalade review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 403-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to a 3rd row seat that has ample room and comfort. see full Cadillac Escalade review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
| 2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
