Cadillac Escalade (2007) vs. Lincoln MKC (2015) Specs

vs.

◆

2007 Cadillac Escalade and 2015 Lincoln MKC Specifications

Model Year	2007	2015
Model	Cadillac Escalade	Lincoln MKC
Engine	6.2L V8 OHV-2v 403 hp@5700 417 lb-ft@4400	turbocharged 2.3L I4 DOHC-4v 285 hp@5500 305 lb-ft@2750
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	AWD	AWD
Body	4dr SUV	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,946 mm	2,690 mm	0 mm
Length	5,144 mm	4,552 mm	1 mm
Width	2,007 mm	1,864 mm	1 mm
Height	1,928 mm	1,656 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	2,570 kg	1,809 kg	1 kg
Fuel Capacity	98 L	59 L	39 L
Headroom, Row 1	1,044 mm	1,006 mm	0 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,659 mm	1,422 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,636 mm	1,382 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,049 mm	1,036 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	996 mm	983 mm	13 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,656 mm	1,405 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,539 mm	1,341 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	991 mm	935 mm	56 mm
Headroom, Row 3	963 mm	0 mm	963 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 3	1,567 mm	0 mm	1 mm
Hip Room, Row 3	1,247 mm	0 mm	1 mm
Legroom, Row 3	650 mm	0 mm	650 mm
Total Legroom	2,690 mm (over 3 rows)	1,971 mm (over 2 rows)	1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	479 L	714 L	-235 L
Cargo Volume, Behind R2	1,708 L	25.2	-24.2 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	3,084 L	1,504 L	2 L

2007 Cadillac Escalade Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr SUV, ext. 403-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Easy access to a 3rd row seat that has ample room and comfort. see full Cadillac Escalade review

2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2015	Seat comfort can be highly subjective, partly because human bodies come in many different shapes and sizes. This said, the MKC's driver seat fit me like a glove from the moment I first sat down. The seat bottom is cushier than most, including those in the Acura and Audi, while the seatback is very well contoured. You'll find more lateral support in the Acura, but the Lincoln's seats offer as much as owners are likely to need in a compact crossover. The view forward from this seat is better than in the Ford Escape, as the MKC's windshield doesn't seem as steeply raked and doesn't have oddly curved, fishbowl-effect lower corners. Also, the top of the Lincoln's instrument panel better disguises its considerable depth. The instrument panels in the Acura and in German competitors require no such artful disguising, as they aren't nearly as deep. To the rear, the MKC's windows are at least as small as the Escape's, and smaller than the Acura's and the Audi's. Luckily the side mirrors are large and blind spot warning is an option. see full Lincoln MKC review

2015 Lincoln MKC Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	Unfortunately, the Lincoln MKC's key weakness is at least as apparent as any of its strengths once one moves beyond the official specs--likely cheated, per Ford's recent practice--and actually sits in its rear seat. The Escape is tighter than most back there, and the MKC is tighter still. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees come within a couple inches of the front seatbacks. Put a tall driver up front, and I wouldn't fit in back. Nearly all competitors have roomier rear seats. You'll find far more shoulder room and rear knee room in the RDX. Perhaps Lincoln should have stretched the MKC's wheelbase a few inches to expand the rear seat. As is, it's about four inches shorter than the RDX, Q5, and Volvo XC60. A roofline an inch lower than the Escape's might improve the exterior's proportions, but it cuts into interior space. see full Lincoln MKC review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Lincoln MKC.

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs and SUTs.

See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.