Model Year | 2008 | 2012 | |
Model | Cadillac Escalade | Lincoln MKZ | |
Engine | 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 301 kW@5700 565 Nm@4400 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 196 kW@6250 338 Nm@4800 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,728 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 5,144 mm | 4,841 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,007 mm | 1,834 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,928 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,570 kg | 1,725 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 98 L | 66 L | 32 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,044 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,659 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,636 mm | 1,372 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 960 mm | 36 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,656 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,539 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 942 mm | 49 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 963 mm | 0 mm | 963 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,567 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,247 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 650 mm | 0 mm | 650 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,690 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 479 L | 467 L | 12 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,708 L | 16.5 | -15.5 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 3,084 L | 16.5 | -13.5 L |
2008 Cadillac Escalade Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2009 | 4dr SUV, ext. 403-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Lots of room for the driver and passenger see full Cadillac Escalade review |
2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 403-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to a 3rd row seat that has ample room and comfort. see full Cadillac Escalade review |
2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Fusion. In the MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
I love driving in luxury, and this car delivers much of it. From the cooled/heated seats to the delicious feel of the leather seating surfaces, this car offers more than adequate comfort...and it is a luxury automobile after all. I would expect no less from Lincoln. see full Lincoln MKZ review |