| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Cadillac Escalade and 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2014 | |
| Model | Cadillac Escalade | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | 6.0L V8 OHV-2v 345 hp@5200 380 lb-ft@4000 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 302 hp@6500 273 lb-ft@3500 |
|
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,946 mm | 2,756 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 5,052 mm | 4,529 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm | 1,887 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,885 mm | 1,699 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,423 kg | 1,782 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 117 L | 66 L | 51 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,656 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,560 mm | 1,351 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,654 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,557 mm | 1,334 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 892 mm | 88 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 950 mm | 0 mm | 950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,636 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,245 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 693 mm | 0 mm | 693 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,723 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,943 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 462 L | 660 L | -198 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,801 L | 23.3 | -22.3 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,962 L | 1,549 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Cadillac Escalade
| 2006 Cadillac Escalade Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 403-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Easy access to a 3rd row seat that has ample room and comfort. see full Cadillac Escalade review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2014 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
