Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Acura RLX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,957 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,981 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,722 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,889 kg | 1,794 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 70 L | 6 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 937 mm | 38 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,384 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,041 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,107 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 615 mm | 0 mm | 615 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 238 L | 433 L | -195 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 917 L | 15.3 | 901.7 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,968 L | 15.3 | -14.3 L |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Acura RLX.