| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Cadillac SRX and 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2015 | |
| Model | Cadillac SRX | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 320 hp@6400 315 lb-ft@4400 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 355 hp@5600 383 lb-ft@4100 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | 4WD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.4 in | 116.0 in | 0.4 in |
| Length | 194.9 in | 204.0 in | -9.1 in |
| Width | 72.6 in | 80.5 in | -7.9 in |
| Height | 67.8 in | 74.4 in | -6.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 4442 lb. | 5683 lb. | -1241 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 42.8 in | -2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.7 in | 64.8 in | -6.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 60.8 in | -4.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 45.3 in | -3.2 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 38.7 in | -0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.6 in | 65.1 in | -7.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.3 in | 60.3 in | -4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 41.0 in | 39.0 in | 2 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.0 in | 38.1 in | -3.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 43.6 in | 62.6 in | -19 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 55.1 in | 49.3 in | 5.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 24.2 in | 24.8 in | -0.6 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.3 in (over 3 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | -1.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.4 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | -6.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 32.4 ft3 | 51.6 ft3 | -19.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 69.5 ft3 | 94.7 ft3 | -25.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Cadillac SRX
| 2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
