

Model Year | 2009 | 2014 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 116.4 in | 104.3 in | 12.1 in |
Length | 194.9 in | 173.6 in | 21.3 in |
Width | 72.6 in | 72.0 in | 0.6 in |
Height | 67.8 in | 63.9 in | 3.9 in |
Curb Weight | 4164 lb. | 3607 lb. | 557 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 6.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 41.0 in | -0.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.7 in | 55.9 in | 2.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 54.3 in | 2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 40.4 in | 1.7 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 39.4 in | -1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.6 in | 55.2 in | 2.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.3 in | 51.9 in | 4.4 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 41.0 in | 36.5 in | 4.5 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 35.0 in | 0.0 in | 35 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 43.6 in | 0.0 in | 43.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 55.1 in | 0.0 in | 55.1 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 24.2 in | 0.0 in | 24.2 in |
Total Legroom | 107.3 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 30.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.4 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -16.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 32.4 ft3 | 24.5 | 7.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 69.5 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 16.9 ft3 |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
2014 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Ford C-MAX.