Model Year | 2009 | 2015 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,957 mm | 3,063 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,818 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,834 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,722 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,889 kg | 1,805 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 60 L | 16 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,191 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 1,146 mm | 974 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,041 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 1,049 mm | 888 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,107 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,400 mm | 1,194 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 615 mm | 889 mm | -274 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 238 L | 561 L | -323 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 917 L | 1,668 L | 916 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,968 L | 2,951 L | -1 L |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
2015 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Transit Connect.