| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Cadillac SRX and 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2013 | |
| Model | Cadillac SRX | Mercedes-Benz GLK | |
| Engine | 4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 320 hp@6400 315 lb-ft@4400 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 302 hp@6500 273 lb-ft@3500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 116.4 in | 108.5 in | 7.9 in |
| Length | 194.9 in | 178.3 in | 16.6 in |
| Width | 72.6 in | 74.3 in | -1.7 in |
| Height | 67.8 in | 66.9 in | 0.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4442 lb. | 4079 lb. | 363 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 17.4 gal. | 2.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.3 in | 39.8 in | 0.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.7 in | 55.2 in | 3.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 53.2 in | 3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 41.4 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 39.7 in | -1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.6 in | 55.4 in | 2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.3 in | 52.5 in | 3.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 41.0 in | 35.1 in | 5.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.0 in | 0.0 in | 35 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 43.6 in | 0.0 in | 43.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 55.1 in | 0.0 in | 55.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 24.2 in | 0.0 in | 24.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.3 in (over 3 rows) | 76.5 in (over 2 rows) | 30.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.4 ft3 | 23.3 ft3 | -14.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 32.4 ft3 | 23.3 | 9.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 69.5 ft3 | 54.7 ft3 | 14.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Cadillac SRX
| 2007 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
My 10 year old son is already over 5 feet and he fits behind me OK. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rooms for me so room for friends to ride without being cramped see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Expect the GLK to grow when it is next fully redesigned. A smaller MLK is on the way to battle the upcoming Audi Q3 and just-arrived BMW X1. For 2013, the GLK's body structure remains essentially the same, so rear seat knee room remains just sufficient for a man of average height sitting behind another such man. (Headroom, on the other hand, is abundant.) Among competitors, only the Infiniti EX37 has a tighter rear seat. The Audi, BMW, and Volvo all offer knees another inch or three. Seat comfort is debatable. To my bottom, the GLK's seats feel overly firm. Cargo space is similarly short of the segment average. The GLK's 54.7 cubic feet isn't far behind the Audi's 57.3 but well below the X3's 63.3. That truncated tail has a downside beyond aesthetics. But do these shortcomings really matter? For most people nearly all of the time, there's enough space. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK
| 2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 168hp 2.1L I4 Diesel 7-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We are a couple with no kids and we rarely have visitors so the cramped rear seating is not a problem. Someone with teenage kids will want to seriously reconsider before getting a GLK. I know my Mom would not appreciate the ingress/egress ease as she has some limited mobility. see full Mercedes-Benz GLK review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
