Model Year | 2009 | 2006 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,957 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,890 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,941 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,722 mm | 1,859 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,889 kg | 2,445 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 96 L | -20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 996 mm | -995 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,585 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 993 mm | -18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,554 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,041 mm | 871 mm | -870 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 925 mm | -36 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,107 mm | 1,554 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,400 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 615 mm | 693 mm | -78 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 238 L | 589 L | -351 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 917 L | 1,110 L | 916 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,968 L | 2,571 L | -1 L |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser.